Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MAT-SU REGIONAL MED CTR 2026-04-26 06:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MAT-SU REGIONAL MED CTR
CCN 020006 | AK | 125 beds | Current EBITDA $80.7M → Pro Forma $96.6M (+$15.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$301.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$80.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$96.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$15.9M
Modeled Uplift
$11.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.6M
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.3M (vs $15.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$193K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.0M$6.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.8M$166K$6.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$926K$2.7M$3.7M$11.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$193K$193K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$97K$193K$193K$193K$193K$193K$193K
Cumulative$0$4.3M$8.6M$12.9M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x27% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$80.7M$80.7M26.7%
Year 1$83.1M+$10.6M$93.7M31.1%
Year 2$85.6M+$15.9M$101.5M33.6%
Year 3$88.2M+$15.9M$104.1M34.5%
Year 4$90.8M+$15.9M$106.7M35.4%
Year 5$93.6M+$15.9M$109.4M36.3%
$807.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.20B
Exit EV (11x)
$396.7M
Value Created
$109.4M
Exit EBITDA
$128.5M
Organic Growth
$158.7M
RCM Value Creation
$109.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.8M$3.7M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$97K$145K$193K$232K
Total$7.9M$11.9M$15.9M$19.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 2082 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin26.7%-14.1%-3.5%7.4%
P96
Net-to-Gross24.8%19.9%28.1%38.2%
P40
Occupancy55.0%45.8%60.5%74.9%
P40
Rev/Bed$2.4M$486K$1.1M$1.7M
P90
Exp/Bed$1.8M$474K$1.1M$1.7M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML