Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTERS 2026-04-26 10:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTERS
CCN 014018 | AL | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $-13K → Pro Forma $221K (+$234K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$4.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-13K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$234K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$221K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+557bps
Margin Improvement
$162K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$234K
Modeled Uplift
$163K
Risk-Adjusted
-$71K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$89K
+212bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$84K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$51K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+23bp
Total EBITDA Impact$234K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$81K$8K$89K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$84K$84K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$13K$38K$51K$162K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$22K$45K$67K$89K$89K$89K$89K
Cost to Collect$0$21K$42K$63K$84K$84K$84K$84K
A/R Days Reduction$0$17K$34K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$65K$131K$191K$234K$234K$234K$234K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $234K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-0.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.0x
Headroom (turns)
108%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 108% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -0.5x, adding 99.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-13K$-13K-0.3%
Year 1$-14K+$156K$143K3.4%
Year 2$-14K+$234K$220K5.2%
Year 3$-14K+$234K$220K5.2%
Year 4$-15K+$234K$220K5.2%
Year 5$-15K+$234K$219K5.2%
$-132K
Entry EV (10x)
$2.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.5M
Value Created
$219K
Exit EBITDA
$-21K
Organic Growth
$2.3M
RCM Value Creation
$219K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$45K$67K$89K$107K
Cost to Collect$42K$63K$84K$101K
A/R Days Reduction$26K$38K$51K$61K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$117K$176K$234K$281K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.3%-32.0%-15.3%-2.6%
P78
Net-to-Gross86.0%29.5%34.9%47.9%
P97
Occupancy67.7%19.8%30.5%41.3%
P92
Rev/Bed$211K$258K$449K$715K
P17
Exp/Bed$211K$378K$566K$892K
P16

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML