Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BRYCE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BRYCE HOSPITAL
CCN 014007 | AL | 98 beds | Current EBITDA $22.5M → Pro Forma $26.6M (+$4.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$76.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$22.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$26.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$4.0M
Modeled Uplift
$2.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.8M (vs $4.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$929K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$49K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$42K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$234K$695K$929K$2.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$49K$49K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$382K$764K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$378K$756K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$310K$620K$929K$929K$929K$929K$929K
Clean Claim Rate$0$24K$49K$49K$49K$49K$49K$49K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
9.0x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.3x
10.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$22.5M$22.5M29.5%
Year 1$23.2M+$2.7M$25.9M33.9%
Year 2$23.9M+$4.0M$27.9M36.6%
Year 3$24.6M+$4.0M$28.6M37.5%
Year 4$25.4M+$4.0M$29.4M38.5%
Year 5$26.1M+$4.0M$30.1M39.5%
$225.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$331.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$106.2M
Value Created
$30.1M
Exit EBITDA
$35.9M
Organic Growth
$40.2M
RCM Value Creation
$30.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$764K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$756K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$465K$697K$929K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$24K$37K$49K$59K
Total$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin29.5%-16.0%-4.3%12.1%
P88
Net-to-Gross100.0%16.6%26.6%62.0%
P94
Occupancy77.2%27.2%54.6%77.8%
P70
Rev/Bed$779K$421K$576K$992K
P66
Exp/Bed$549K$381K$588K$1.0M
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML