Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REGIONAL REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REGIONAL REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 013033 | AL | 58 beds | Current EBITDA $11.4M → Pro Forma $13.1M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$33.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$11.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

77%
Realization (B)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$406K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$666K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$660K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$405K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$666K$666K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$641K$18K$660K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$102K$303K$405K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$167K$333K$500K$666K$666K$666K$666K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$165K$330K$495K$660K$660K$660K$660K
A/R Days Reduction$0$135K$270K$405K$405K$405K$405K$405K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$477K$954K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
9.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x
10.0x35% / 4.4x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x
12.0x26% / 3.1x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.6x38% / 4.9x40% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$11.4M$11.4M34.2%
Year 1$11.7M+$1.2M$12.9M38.7%
Year 2$12.1M+$1.8M$13.8M41.6%
Year 3$12.5M+$1.8M$14.2M42.6%
Year 4$12.8M+$1.8M$14.6M43.8%
Year 5$13.2M+$1.8M$15.0M44.9%
$113.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$164.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$50.6M
Value Created
$15.0M
Exit EBITDA
$18.1M
Organic Growth
$17.5M
RCM Value Creation
$15.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$333K$500K$666K$799K
Denial Rate Reductio$330K$495K$660K$791K
A/R Days Reduction$203K$304K$405K$486K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$21K$26K
Total$876K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 60 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin34.2%-24.3%-14.2%5.8%
P97
Net-to-Gross71.9%24.5%32.0%46.3%
P93
Occupancy98.4%22.9%31.8%55.5%
P98
Rev/Bed$574K$330K$478K$635K
P64
Exp/Bed$378K$378K$528K$691K
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML