Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 10:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 013031 | AL | 34 beds | Current EBITDA $1.8M → Pro Forma $2.7M (+$915K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$915K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$667K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$915K
Modeled Uplift
$681K
Risk-Adjusted
-$235K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$348K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$345K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$212K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$915K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$348K$348K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$335K$10K$345K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$53K$158K$212K$667K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$87K$174K$261K$348K$348K$348K$348K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$86K$172K$258K$345K$345K$345K$345K
A/R Days Reduction$0$71K$141K$212K$212K$212K$212K$212K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$249K$499K$742K$915K$915K$915K$915K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $915K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x
9.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
10.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x57% / 9.7x
11.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
12.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.8M$1.8M10.5%
Year 1$1.9M+$610K$2.5M14.4%
Year 2$1.9M+$915K$2.9M16.4%
Year 3$2.0M+$915K$2.9M16.8%
Year 4$2.1M+$915K$3.0M17.1%
Year 5$2.1M+$915K$3.0M17.5%
$18.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$33.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$15.1M
Value Created
$3.0M
Exit EBITDA
$2.9M
Organic Growth
$9.2M
RCM Value Creation
$3.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$174K$261K$348K$418K
Denial Rate Reductio$172K$258K$345K$413K
A/R Days Reduction$106K$159K$212K$254K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$8K$11K$13K
Total$458K$687K$915K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 58 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.5%-29.2%-16.3%-2.8%
P88
Net-to-Gross60.8%26.3%32.2%44.4%
P88
Occupancy87.5%20.3%28.9%45.3%
P93
Rev/Bed$512K$309K$480K$738K
P56
Exp/Bed$458K$378K$561K$877K
P36

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML