Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 013030 | AL | 56 beds | Current EBITDA $5.6M → Pro Forma $6.5M (+$910K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$910K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$664K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$910K
Modeled Uplift
$693K
Risk-Adjusted
-$217K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$346K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$343K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$211K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$910K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$346K$346K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$333K$10K$343K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$53K$157K$211K$664K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$87K$173K$260K$346K$346K$346K$346K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$86K$171K$257K$343K$343K$343K$343K
A/R Days Reduction$0$70K$140K$211K$211K$211K$211K$211K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$248K$496K$738K$910K$910K$910K$910K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $910K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x
9.0x40% / 5.3x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x
11.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x
12.0x26% / 3.2x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.6x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.6M$5.6M32.1%
Year 1$5.7M+$607K$6.3M36.6%
Year 2$5.9M+$910K$6.8M39.3%
Year 3$6.1M+$910K$7.0M40.4%
Year 4$6.3M+$910K$7.2M41.4%
Year 5$6.4M+$910K$7.4M42.5%
$55.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$80.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$25.3M
Value Created
$7.4M
Exit EBITDA
$8.9M
Organic Growth
$9.1M
RCM Value Creation
$7.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$173K$260K$346K$415K
Denial Rate Reductio$171K$257K$343K$411K
A/R Days Reduction$105K$158K$211K$253K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$8K$11K$13K
Total$455K$683K$910K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 62 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin32.1%-24.4%-14.2%5.6%
P95
Net-to-Gross72.1%24.0%32.0%45.0%
P95
Occupancy98.1%22.4%31.8%54.1%
P97
Rev/Bed$309K$322K$478K$645K
P23
Exp/Bed$210K$379K$528K$715K
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML