Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 013029 | AL | 85 beds | Current EBITDA $7.5M → Pro Forma $9.7M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$42.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$549K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$842K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$834K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$513K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$27K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$842K$842K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$811K$23K$834K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$129K$383K$513K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$27K$27K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$211K$421K$632K$842K$842K$842K$842K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$209K$417K$626K$834K$834K$834K$834K
A/R Days Reduction$0$171K$342K$513K$513K$513K$513K$513K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K
Cumulative$0$603K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.7x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
9.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
10.0x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x
12.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.0x
Headroom (turns)
-1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.5M$7.5M17.9%
Year 1$7.8M+$1.5M$9.2M21.9%
Year 2$8.0M+$2.2M$10.2M24.2%
Year 3$8.2M+$2.2M$10.4M24.8%
Year 4$8.5M+$2.2M$10.7M25.4%
Year 5$8.7M+$2.2M$10.9M26.0%
$75.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$120.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$45.1M
Value Created
$10.9M
Exit EBITDA
$12.0M
Organic Growth
$22.2M
RCM Value Creation
$10.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$421K$632K$842K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$417K$626K$834K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$256K$384K$513K$615K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$27K$32K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 42 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.9%-18.2%-9.8%6.3%
P88
Net-to-Gross63.6%22.3%30.2%43.6%
P80
Occupancy95.5%24.7%37.3%63.7%
P93
Rev/Bed$496K$397K$518K$832K
P42
Exp/Bed$407K$382K$552K$826K
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML