Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH LAKESHORE REHABILIT 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH LAKESHORE REHABILIT
CCN 013025 | AL | 100 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.4M → Pro Forma $94K (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$46.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$94K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$658K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$939K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$929K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$571K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$30K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$939K$939K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$903K$26K$929K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$144K$427K$571K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$30K$30K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$235K$469K$704K$939K$939K$939K$939K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$232K$465K$697K$929K$929K$929K$929K
A/R Days Reduction$0$190K$381K$571K$571K$571K$571K$571K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K
Cumulative$0$672K$1.3M$2.0M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-213.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
219.9x
Headroom (turns)
3384%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3384% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -213.4x, adding 312.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.4M$-2.4M-5.1%
Year 1$-2.4M+$1.6M$-800K-1.7%
Year 2$-2.5M+$2.5M$-50K-0.1%
Year 3$-2.6M+$2.5M$-126K-0.3%
Year 4$-2.7M+$2.5M$-204K-0.4%
Year 5$-2.8M+$2.5M$-284K-0.6%
$-23.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.6M
Value Created
$-284K
Exit EBITDA
$-3.8M
Organic Growth
$24.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-284K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$469K$704K$939K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$465K$697K$929K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$286K$428K$571K$685K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$23K$30K$36K
Total$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 30 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.1%-15.9%-3.8%11.4%
P38
Net-to-Gross68.2%10.9%26.7%63.6%
P79
Occupancy88.5%29.1%56.8%77.7%
P87
Rev/Bed$469K$435K$578K$1.0M
P31
Exp/Bed$493K$380K$594K$1.1M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML