Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTH ALABAMA SPECIALTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 13:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTH ALABAMA SPECIALTY HOSPITAL
CCN 012014 | AL | 31 beds | Current EBITDA $1.4M → Pro Forma $2.0M (+$595K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$595K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+530bps
Margin Improvement
$431K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$595K
Modeled Uplift
$396K
Risk-Adjusted
-$199K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$225K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$224K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$137K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$595K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$225K$225K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$216K$8K$224K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$34K$102K$137K$431K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$56K$112K$168K$225K$225K$225K$225K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$56K$112K$168K$224K$224K$224K$224K
A/R Days Reduction$0$46K$91K$137K$137K$137K$137K$137K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$163K$325K$483K$595K$595K$595K$595K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $595K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.7x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x
9.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
10.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.4M$1.4M12.3%
Year 1$1.4M+$397K$1.8M16.2%
Year 2$1.5M+$595K$2.1M18.4%
Year 3$1.5M+$595K$2.1M18.8%
Year 4$1.6M+$595K$2.2M19.2%
Year 5$1.6M+$595K$2.2M19.6%
$13.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$24.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.4M
Value Created
$2.2M
Exit EBITDA
$2.2M
Organic Growth
$6.0M
RCM Value Creation
$2.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$112K$168K$225K$270K
Denial Rate Reductio$112K$168K$224K$269K
A/R Days Reduction$68K$102K$137K$164K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$298K$446K$595K$714K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.3%-27.9%-16.0%-2.2%
P93
Net-to-Gross44.4%26.4%32.3%44.3%
P74
Occupancy47.6%20.7%27.4%42.1%
P78
Rev/Bed$362K$313K$478K$697K
P31
Exp/Bed$318K$379K$555K$814K
P18

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML