Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NOLAND HOSPITAL TUSCALOOSA II 2026-04-26 06:16 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NOLAND HOSPITAL TUSCALOOSA II
CCN 012012 | AL | 32 beds | Current EBITDA $658K → Pro Forma $977K (+$318K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$5.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$658K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$318K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$977K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+545bps
Margin Improvement
$224K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$318K
Modeled Uplift
$199K
Risk-Adjusted
-$119K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$121K
+207bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$117K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$71K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+16bp
Total EBITDA Impact$318K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$113K$8K$121K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$117K$117K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$18K$53K$71K$224K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$30K$60K$91K$121K$121K$121K$121K
Cost to Collect$0$29K$58K$88K$117K$117K$117K$117K
A/R Days Reduction$0$24K$47K$71K$71K$71K$71K$71K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$88K$176K$259K$318K$318K$318K$318K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $318K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x
9.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
10.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
11.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
12.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.5x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.8x
Headroom (turns)
12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.7x, adding 2.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$658K$658K11.3%
Year 1$678K+$212K$890K15.2%
Year 2$698K+$318K$1.0M17.4%
Year 3$719K+$318K$1.0M17.7%
Year 4$741K+$318K$1.1M18.1%
Year 5$763K+$318K$1.1M18.5%
$6.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$11.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.3M
Value Created
$1.1M
Exit EBITDA
$1.0M
Organic Growth
$3.2M
RCM Value Creation
$1.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$60K$91K$121K$145K
Cost to Collect$58K$88K$117K$140K
A/R Days Reduction$36K$53K$71K$85K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$159K$239K$318K$382K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.3%-27.9%-16.0%-2.2%
P89
Net-to-Gross33.3%26.4%32.3%44.3%
P52
Occupancy31.6%20.7%27.4%42.1%
P53
Rev/Bed$183K$313K$478K$697K
P7
Exp/Bed$162K$379K$555K$814K
P5

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML