Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - BIRMINGHAM 2026-04-26 06:17 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - BIRMINGHAM
CCN 012008 | AL | 38 beds | Current EBITDA $-337K → Pro Forma $569K (+$906K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-337K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$906K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$569K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$660K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$906K
Modeled Uplift
$655K
Risk-Adjusted
-$250K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$344K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$341K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$210K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$906K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$344K$344K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$331K$9K$341K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$53K$157K$210K$660K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$86K$172K$258K$344K$344K$344K$344K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$85K$170K$256K$341K$341K$341K$341K
A/R Days Reduction$0$70K$140K$210K$210K$210K$210K$210K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$247K$493K$734K$906K$906K$906K$906K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $906K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
11.5x
Headroom (turns)
177%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 177% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -5.0x, adding 104.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-337K$-337K-2.0%
Year 1$-347K+$604K$257K1.5%
Year 2$-358K+$906K$548K3.2%
Year 3$-368K+$906K$537K3.1%
Year 4$-379K+$906K$526K3.1%
Year 5$-391K+$906K$515K3.0%
$-3.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$5.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.0M
Value Created
$515K
Exit EBITDA
$-537K
Organic Growth
$9.1M
RCM Value Creation
$515K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$172K$258K$344K$413K
Denial Rate Reductio$170K$256K$341K$409K
A/R Days Reduction$105K$157K$210K$251K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$8K$11K$13K
Total$453K$679K$906K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 59 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.0%-29.0%-16.2%-2.2%
P74
Net-to-Gross9.7%26.4%32.3%46.3%
P0
Occupancy75.2%20.7%30.5%47.0%
P90
Rev/Bed$453K$313K$478K$730K
P45
Exp/Bed$462K$379K$555K$862K
P39

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML