Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. VINCENTS BLOUNT 2026-04-26 14:09 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. VINCENTS BLOUNT
CCN 011305 | AL | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.3M → Pro Forma $-7.0M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$25.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-7.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$965K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$868K
Risk-Adjusted
-$455K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$503K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$498K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$306K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$503K$503K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$484K$14K$498K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$77K$229K$306K$965K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$126K$252K$377K$503K$503K$503K$503K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$125K$249K$374K$498K$498K$498K$498K
A/R Days Reduction$0$102K$204K$306K$306K$306K$306K$306K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$360K$721K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.3M$-8.3M-33.1%
Year 1$-8.6M+$882K$-7.7M-30.6%
Year 2$-8.8M+$1.3M$-7.5M-29.8%
Year 3$-9.1M+$1.3M$-7.8M-30.9%
Year 4$-9.4M+$1.3M$-8.0M-32.0%
Year 5$-9.6M+$1.3M$-8.3M-33.1%
$-83.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-91.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$-8.3M
Value Created
$-8.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-13.2M
Organic Growth
$13.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-8.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$252K$377K$503K$604K
Denial Rate Reductio$249K$374K$498K$598K
A/R Days Reduction$153K$230K$306K$367K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$662K$993K$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-33.1%-28.7%-16.1%-3.1%
P15
Net-to-Gross30.0%27.4%32.8%44.0%
P35
Occupancy42.3%20.0%26.5%39.4%
P79
Rev/Bed$1.0M$321K$478K$752K
P85
Exp/Bed$1.3M$381K$566K$892K
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML