Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. VINCENTS CHILTON 2026-04-26 12:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. VINCENTS CHILTON
CCN 010173 | AL | 26 beds | Current EBITDA $2.7M → Pro Forma $4.2M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$29.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$955K
Risk-Adjusted
-$574K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$581K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$576K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$354K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$581K$581K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$560K$16K$576K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$89K$265K$354K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$145K$291K$436K$581K$581K$581K$581K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$144K$288K$432K$576K$576K$576K$576K
A/R Days Reduction$0$118K$236K$354K$354K$354K$354K$354K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$416K$833K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x
9.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
10.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
11.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
12.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.1x
Headroom (turns)
17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.7M$2.7M9.2%
Year 1$2.8M+$1.0M$3.8M13.0%
Year 2$2.8M+$1.5M$4.4M15.1%
Year 3$2.9M+$1.5M$4.5M15.4%
Year 4$3.0M+$1.5M$4.6M15.7%
Year 5$3.1M+$1.5M$4.6M16.0%
$26.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$51.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$24.2M
Value Created
$4.6M
Exit EBITDA
$4.3M
Organic Growth
$15.3M
RCM Value Creation
$4.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$291K$436K$581K$698K
Denial Rate Reductio$288K$432K$576K$691K
A/R Days Reduction$177K$265K$354K$424K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$19K$22K
Total$765K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.2%-28.7%-16.1%-3.1%
P87
Net-to-Gross18.1%27.4%32.8%44.0%
P8
Occupancy26.1%20.0%26.5%39.4%
P45
Rev/Bed$1.1M$321K$478K$752K
P92
Exp/Bed$1.0M$381K$566K$892K
P83

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML