Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER EAST 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER EAST
CCN 010149 | AL | 208 beds | Current EBITDA $-16.8M → Pro Forma $-7.9M (+$8.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$169.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-16.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$8.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-7.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$8.9M
Modeled Uplift
$6.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.4M (vs $8.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$108K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$8.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.4M$3.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.3M$93K$3.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$520K$1.5M$2.1M$6.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$108K$108K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$848K$1.7M$2.5M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$839K$1.7M$2.5M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$688K$1.4M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$54K$108K$108K$108K$108K$108K$108K
Cumulative$0$2.4M$4.9M$7.2M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-16.8M$-16.8M-9.9%
Year 1$-17.3M+$5.9M$-11.4M-6.7%
Year 2$-17.8M+$8.9M$-8.9M-5.3%
Year 3$-18.4M+$8.9M$-9.4M-5.6%
Year 4$-18.9M+$8.9M$-10.0M-5.9%
Year 5$-19.5M+$8.9M$-10.6M-6.2%
$-168.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-116.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$51.9M
Value Created
$-10.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-26.8M
Organic Growth
$89.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-10.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.7M$2.5M$3.4M$4.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.7M$2.5M$3.4M$4.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.5M
Clean Claim Rate$54K$81K$108K$130K
Total$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$10.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.9%-10.3%-4.8%2.3%
P26
Net-to-Gross26.6%10.2%21.3%31.1%
P65
Occupancy77.9%49.9%64.6%77.7%
P76
Rev/Bed$815K$702K$984K$1.3M
P38
Exp/Bed$896K$749K$984K$1.3M
P44

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML