Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CRESTWOOD MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CRESTWOOD MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 010131 | AL | 164 beds | Current EBITDA $37.9M → Pro Forma $51.5M (+$13.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$258.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$37.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$51.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$13.6M
Modeled Uplift
$9.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.6M (vs $13.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$166K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.2M$5.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.0M$142K$5.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$795K$2.4M$3.2M$9.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$166K$166K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.8M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$83K$166K$166K$166K$166K$166K$166K
Cumulative$0$3.7M$7.4M$11.0M$13.6M$13.6M$13.6M$13.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x
9.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
10.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
11.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$37.9M$37.9M14.6%
Year 1$39.0M+$9.1M$48.1M18.6%
Year 2$40.2M+$13.6M$53.8M20.8%
Year 3$41.4M+$13.6M$55.0M21.2%
Year 4$42.6M+$13.6M$56.3M21.7%
Year 5$43.9M+$13.6M$57.5M22.2%
$378.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$633.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$254.1M
Value Created
$57.5M
Exit EBITDA
$60.3M
Organic Growth
$136.2M
RCM Value Creation
$57.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.6M$3.8M$5.1M$6.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M
Clean Claim Rate$83K$124K$166K$199K
Total$6.8M$10.2M$13.6M$16.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 35 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.6%-10.3%-3.7%4.7%
P85
Net-to-Gross7.4%9.9%21.0%31.6%
P9
Occupancy63.9%37.5%59.8%76.6%
P54
Rev/Bed$1.6M$520K$770K$1.1M
P97
Exp/Bed$1.3M$544K$779K$1.1M
P89

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML