Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. VINCENTS ST. CLAIR 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. VINCENTS ST. CLAIR
CCN 010130 | AL | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $3.6M → Pro Forma $5.7M (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$40.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$632K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$816K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$808K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$497K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$816K$816K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$786K$22K$808K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$125K$371K$497K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$204K$408K$612K$816K$816K$816K$816K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$202K$404K$606K$808K$808K$808K$808K
A/R Days Reduction$0$166K$331K$497K$497K$497K$497K$497K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$585K$1.2M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.7x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x
9.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x
10.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
11.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x
12.0x40% / 5.3x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
19%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 19% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.6M$3.6M8.7%
Year 1$3.7M+$1.4M$5.1M12.5%
Year 2$3.8M+$2.1M$5.9M14.5%
Year 3$3.9M+$2.1M$6.0M14.8%
Year 4$4.0M+$2.1M$6.1M15.1%
Year 5$4.1M+$2.1M$6.3M15.4%
$35.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$68.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$33.4M
Value Created
$6.3M
Exit EBITDA
$5.7M
Organic Growth
$21.5M
RCM Value Creation
$6.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$408K$612K$816K$980K
Denial Rate Reductio$404K$606K$808K$970K
A/R Days Reduction$248K$373K$497K$596K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$26K$31K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 61 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.7%-28.7%-16.2%-1.5%
P82
Net-to-Gross14.3%26.5%32.3%45.0%
P3
Occupancy64.8%21.3%28.1%46.4%
P85
Rev/Bed$1.0M$307K$467K$715K
P88
Exp/Bed$932K$378K$530K$833K
P77

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML