Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JACKSON MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JACKSON MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 010128 | AL | 35 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.4M → Pro Forma $-2.8M (+$606K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$606K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+530bps
Margin Improvement
$439K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$606K
Modeled Uplift
$361K
Risk-Adjusted
-$245K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$229K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$228K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$139K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$606K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$229K$229K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$220K$8K$228K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$35K$104K$139K$439K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$57K$114K$172K$229K$229K$229K$229K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$57K$114K$171K$228K$228K$228K$228K
A/R Days Reduction$0$46K$93K$139K$139K$139K$139K$139K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$165K$331K$492K$606K$606K$606K$606K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $606K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.4M$-3.4M-30.2%
Year 1$-3.6M+$404K$-3.1M-27.5%
Year 2$-3.7M+$606K$-3.1M-26.7%
Year 3$-3.8M+$606K$-3.2M-27.7%
Year 4$-3.9M+$606K$-3.3M-28.6%
Year 5$-4.0M+$606K$-3.4M-29.7%
$-34.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-37.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$-2.8M
Value Created
$-3.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.5M
Organic Growth
$6.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$114K$172K$229K$274K
Denial Rate Reductio$114K$171K$228K$274K
A/R Days Reduction$70K$104K$139K$167K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$303K$454K$606K$727K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 58 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-30.2%-29.2%-16.3%-2.8%
P23
Net-to-Gross35.7%26.3%32.2%44.4%
P58
Occupancy17.3%20.3%28.9%45.3%
P17
Rev/Bed$327K$309K$480K$738K
P26
Exp/Bed$425K$378K$561K$877K
P34

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML