Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MOBILE INFIRMARY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MOBILE INFIRMARY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 010113 | AL | 593 beds | Current EBITDA $16.8M → Pro Forma $45.3M (+$28.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$542.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$16.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$28.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$45.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$28.5M
Modeled Uplift
$18.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.3M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $18.3M (vs $28.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$347K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$28.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.8M$10.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.4M$298K$10.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.7M$4.9M$6.6M$20.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$347K$347K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$10.7M$10.7M$10.7M$10.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$174K$347K$347K$347K$347K$347K$347K
Cumulative$0$7.8M$15.5M$23.1M$28.5M$28.5M$28.5M$28.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $28.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x78% / 17.6x82% / 20.0x86% / 22.3x88% / 23.4x90% / 24.6x
9.0x73% / 15.3x77% / 17.4x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.5x85% / 21.5x
10.0x68% / 13.5x73% / 15.3x77% / 17.2x78% / 18.1x80% / 19.0x
11.0x64% / 11.9x69% / 13.6x73% / 15.3x74% / 16.2x76% / 17.0x
12.0x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.5x73% / 15.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.4x
Headroom (turns)
52%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 52% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.1x, adding 5.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$16.8M$16.8M3.1%
Year 1$17.3M+$19.0M$36.3M6.7%
Year 2$17.8M+$28.5M$46.4M8.6%
Year 3$18.4M+$28.5M$46.9M8.6%
Year 4$18.9M+$28.5M$47.4M8.8%
Year 5$19.5M+$28.5M$48.0M8.9%
$168.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$528.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$360.0M
Value Created
$48.0M
Exit EBITDA
$26.8M
Organic Growth
$285.2M
RCM Value Creation
$48.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$13.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.4M$8.1M$10.7M$12.9M
A/R Days Reduction$3.3M$4.9M$6.6M$7.9M
Clean Claim Rate$174K$260K$347K$416K
Total$14.3M$21.4M$28.5M$34.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 13 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.1%-6.9%-5.0%-3.2%
P77
Net-to-Gross35.8%20.7%25.4%33.0%
P77
Occupancy61.3%61.3%74.5%82.9%
P23
Rev/Bed$914K$914K$1.3M$1.6M
P23
Exp/Bed$886K$886K$1.3M$1.8M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML