Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BULLOCK COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BULLOCK COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 010110 | AL | 29 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.4M → Pro Forma $-2.7M (+$733K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$733K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$534K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$733K
Modeled Uplift
$422K
Risk-Adjusted
-$311K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$278K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$276K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$169K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$733K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$278K$278K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$268K$8K$276K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$43K$127K$169K$534K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$70K$139K$209K$278K$278K$278K$278K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$69K$138K$207K$276K$276K$276K$276K
A/R Days Reduction$0$56K$113K$169K$169K$169K$169K$169K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$200K$400K$595K$733K$733K$733K$733K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $733K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.4M$-3.4M-24.4%
Year 1$-3.5M+$489K$-3.0M-21.6%
Year 2$-3.6M+$733K$-2.9M-20.6%
Year 3$-3.7M+$733K$-3.0M-21.4%
Year 4$-3.8M+$733K$-3.1M-22.2%
Year 5$-3.9M+$733K$-3.2M-23.0%
$-33.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-35.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.3M
Value Created
$-3.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.4M
Organic Growth
$7.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$139K$209K$278K$334K
Denial Rate Reductio$138K$207K$276K$331K
A/R Days Reduction$85K$127K$169K$203K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$367K$550K$733K$880K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 57 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-24.4%-26.6%-15.3%-2.6%
P30
Net-to-Gross40.0%26.5%32.8%45.0%
P66
Occupancy4.9%21.3%27.4%42.0%
P4
Rev/Bed$480K$322K$481K$752K
P48
Exp/Bed$597K$379K$566K$892K
P54

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML