Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PRINCETON BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PRINCETON BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 010103 | AL | 261 beds | Current EBITDA $5.0M → Pro Forma $16.3M (+$11.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$216.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$16.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$11.4M
Modeled Uplift
$7.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.7M (vs $11.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$138K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.3M$4.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.2M$119K$4.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$664K$2.0M$2.6M$8.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$138K$138K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.2M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$877K$1.8M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$69K$138K$138K$138K$138K$138K$138K
Cumulative$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.2M$11.4M$11.4M$11.4M$11.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x86% / 22.0x90% / 24.8x94% / 27.6x96% / 29.0x98% / 30.4x
9.0x81% / 19.2x85% / 21.7x89% / 24.2x91% / 25.4x93% / 26.7x
10.0x76% / 16.9x81% / 19.2x85% / 21.4x86% / 22.6x88% / 23.7x
11.0x72% / 15.1x77% / 17.1x81% / 19.2x82% / 20.2x84% / 21.2x
12.0x68% / 13.6x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.3x79% / 18.2x81% / 19.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.9x
Headroom (turns)
60%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 60% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.6x, adding 5.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.0M$5.0M2.3%
Year 1$5.1M+$7.6M$12.7M5.9%
Year 2$5.3M+$11.4M$16.6M7.7%
Year 3$5.4M+$11.4M$16.8M7.8%
Year 4$5.6M+$11.4M$17.0M7.8%
Year 5$5.8M+$11.4M$17.1M7.9%
$49.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$188.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$138.8M
Value Created
$17.1M
Exit EBITDA
$7.9M
Organic Growth
$113.8M
RCM Value Creation
$17.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.2M$3.2M$4.3M$5.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$69K$104K$138K$166K
Total$5.7M$8.5M$11.4M$13.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 30 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.3%-9.1%-4.6%1.9%
P77
Net-to-Gross10.4%10.6%21.3%31.1%
P23
Occupancy58.6%53.2%66.3%77.9%
P33
Rev/Bed$829K$723K$1.1M$1.3M
P37
Exp/Bed$810K$781K$1.1M$1.3M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML