Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WALKER BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WALKER BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 010089 | AL | 207 beds | Current EBITDA $19.8M → Pro Forma $25.5M (+$5.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$108.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$19.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$25.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$5.7M
Modeled Uplift
$3.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.5M (vs $5.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$70K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.2M$2.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.1M$60K$2.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$334K$989K$1.3M$4.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$70K$70K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$544K$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$538K$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$441K$882K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$35K$70K$70K$70K$70K$70K$70K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.6M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
9.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
12.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$19.8M$19.8M18.2%
Year 1$20.4M+$3.8M$24.2M22.3%
Year 2$21.0M+$5.7M$26.7M24.6%
Year 3$21.7M+$5.7M$27.4M25.2%
Year 4$22.3M+$5.7M$28.0M25.8%
Year 5$23.0M+$5.7M$28.7M26.4%
$198.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$315.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$117.5M
Value Created
$28.7M
Exit EBITDA
$31.6M
Organic Growth
$57.2M
RCM Value Creation
$28.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$661K$992K$1.3M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$35K$52K$70K$83K
Total$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$6.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.2%-10.3%-4.8%2.3%
P94
Net-to-Gross9.6%10.2%21.3%31.1%
P18
Occupancy29.9%49.9%64.6%77.7%
P6
Rev/Bed$525K$702K$984K$1.3M
P12
Exp/Bed$429K$749K$984K$1.3M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML