Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTHEAST ALABAMA REGIONAL MED CTR 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTHEAST ALABAMA REGIONAL MED CTR
CCN 010078 | AL | 295 beds | Current EBITDA $-24.7M → Pro Forma $-13.6M (+$11.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$209.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-24.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-13.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$11.0M
Modeled Uplift
$7.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.7M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.3M (vs $11.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$134K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.2M$4.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.0M$115K$4.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$642K$1.9M$2.5M$8.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$134K$134K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$849K$1.7M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$67K$134K$134K$134K$134K$134K$134K
Cumulative$0$3.0M$6.0M$8.9M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-24.7M$-24.7M-11.8%
Year 1$-25.4M+$7.3M$-18.0M-8.6%
Year 2$-26.2M+$11.0M$-15.1M-7.2%
Year 3$-26.9M+$11.0M$-15.9M-7.6%
Year 4$-27.7M+$11.0M$-16.7M-8.0%
Year 5$-28.6M+$11.0M$-17.6M-8.4%
$-246.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-193.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$53.3M
Value Created
$-17.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-39.3M
Organic Growth
$110.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-17.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$5.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.1M$3.1M$4.1M$5.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$67K$100K$134K$161K
Total$5.5M$8.3M$11.0M$13.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 29 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-11.8%-9.9%-4.4%2.3%
P14
Net-to-Gross12.2%10.4%20.8%31.2%
P31
Occupancy55.8%52.7%67.0%77.9%
P31
Rev/Bed$710K$711K$1.0M$1.3M
P21
Exp/Bed$793K$779K$1.0M$1.3M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML