Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CENTER BARBOUR 2026-04-26 12:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CENTER BARBOUR
CCN 010069 | AL | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.0M → Pro Forma $-5.1M (+$926K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$926K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-5.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$675K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$926K
Modeled Uplift
$587K
Risk-Adjusted
-$339K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$352K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$349K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$214K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$926K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$352K$352K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$339K$10K$349K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$54K$160K$214K$675K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$88K$176K$264K$352K$352K$352K$352K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$87K$174K$262K$349K$349K$349K$349K
A/R Days Reduction$0$71K$143K$214K$214K$214K$214K$214K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$252K$505K$751K$926K$926K$926K$926K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $926K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.0M$-6.0M-34.1%
Year 1$-6.2M+$618K$-5.6M-31.6%
Year 2$-6.4M+$926K$-5.4M-30.9%
Year 3$-6.6M+$926K$-5.6M-32.0%
Year 4$-6.8M+$926K$-5.8M-33.1%
Year 5$-7.0M+$926K$-6.0M-34.3%
$-60.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-66.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$-6.3M
Value Created
$-6.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-9.6M
Organic Growth
$9.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-6.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$176K$264K$352K$423K
Denial Rate Reductio$174K$262K$349K$418K
A/R Days Reduction$107K$161K$214K$257K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$8K$11K$14K
Total$463K$695K$926K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 57 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-34.1%-26.6%-15.3%-2.6%
P11
Net-to-Gross25.5%26.5%32.8%45.0%
P21
Occupancy34.5%21.3%27.4%42.0%
P58
Rev/Bed$587K$322K$481K$752K
P62
Exp/Bed$787K$379K$566K$892K
P68

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML