Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CENTER ENTERPRISE 2026-04-26 04:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CENTER ENTERPRISE
CCN 010049 | AL | 99 beds | Current EBITDA $918K → Pro Forma $4.0M (+$3.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$59.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$918K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$3.1M
Modeled Uplift
$2.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.0M (vs $3.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$719K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$38K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$33K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$181K$538K$719K$2.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$38K$38K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$296K$591K$887K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$293K$585K$878K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$240K$480K$719K$719K$719K$719K$719K
Clean Claim Rate$0$19K$38K$38K$38K$38K$38K$38K
Cumulative$0$847K$1.7M$2.5M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x97% / 30.0x102% / 33.7x106% / 37.4x108% / 39.3x110% / 41.1x
9.0x92% / 26.3x97% / 29.6x101% / 32.9x103% / 34.5x105% / 36.2x
10.0x88% / 23.4x92% / 26.3x96% / 29.3x98% / 30.8x100% / 32.2x
11.0x84% / 20.9x88% / 23.6x92% / 26.3x94% / 27.7x96% / 29.0x
12.0x80% / 18.9x85% / 21.4x89% / 23.9x90% / 25.1x92% / 26.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.6x
Headroom (turns)
70%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 70% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.9x, adding 6.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$918K$918K1.6%
Year 1$945K+$2.1M$3.0M5.1%
Year 2$973K+$3.1M$4.1M6.9%
Year 3$1.0M+$3.1M$4.1M7.0%
Year 4$1.0M+$3.1M$4.1M7.0%
Year 5$1.1M+$3.1M$4.2M7.1%
$9.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$45.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$36.7M
Value Created
$4.2M
Exit EBITDA
$1.5M
Organic Growth
$31.1M
RCM Value Creation
$4.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$591K$887K$1.2M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$585K$878K$1.2M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$360K$540K$719K$863K
Clean Claim Rate$19K$28K$38K$45K
Total$1.6M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 30 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.6%-15.9%-3.8%11.4%
P59
Net-to-Gross6.5%10.9%26.7%63.6%
P0
Occupancy38.1%29.1%56.8%77.7%
P30
Rev/Bed$597K$435K$578K$1.0M
P55
Exp/Bed$588K$380K$594K$1.1M
P47

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML