Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MARION REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MARION REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 010044 | AL | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.2M → Pro Forma $-1.1M (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$755K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$640K
Risk-Adjusted
-$396K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$394K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$390K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$240K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$394K$394K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$379K$11K$390K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$60K$179K$240K$755K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$98K$197K$295K$394K$394K$394K$394K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$97K$195K$292K$390K$390K$390K$390K
A/R Days Reduction$0$80K$160K$240K$240K$240K$240K$240K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$282K$564K$840K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.2M$-2.2M-11.0%
Year 1$-2.2M+$691K$-1.5M-7.8%
Year 2$-2.3M+$1.0M$-1.3M-6.4%
Year 3$-2.4M+$1.0M$-1.3M-6.7%
Year 4$-2.4M+$1.0M$-1.4M-7.1%
Year 5$-2.5M+$1.0M$-1.5M-7.4%
$-21.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-16.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.5M
Value Created
$-1.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-3.4M
Organic Growth
$10.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$197K$295K$394K$473K
Denial Rate Reductio$195K$292K$390K$468K
A/R Days Reduction$120K$180K$240K$288K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$13K$15K
Total$518K$777K$1.0M$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 58 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-11.0%-29.2%-16.3%-2.8%
P67
Net-to-Gross28.2%26.3%32.2%44.4%
P30
Occupancy21.9%20.3%28.9%45.3%
P31
Rev/Bed$547K$309K$480K$738K
P60
Exp/Bed$607K$378K$561K$877K
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML