Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — STRINGFELLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 11:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — STRINGFELLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 010038 | AL | 125 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.2M → Pro Forma $-6.6M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$30.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-6.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$992K
Risk-Adjusted
-$634K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$618K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$612K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$376K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$20K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$618K$618K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$595K$17K$612K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$95K$281K$376K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$20K$20K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$155K$309K$464K$618K$618K$618K$618K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$153K$306K$459K$612K$612K$612K$612K
A/R Days Reduction$0$125K$251K$376K$376K$376K$376K$376K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K
Cumulative$0$443K$886K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.2M$-8.2M-26.5%
Year 1$-8.4M+$1.1M$-7.3M-23.7%
Year 2$-8.7M+$1.6M$-7.0M-22.8%
Year 3$-8.9M+$1.6M$-7.3M-23.7%
Year 4$-9.2M+$1.6M$-7.6M-24.5%
Year 5$-9.5M+$1.6M$-7.9M-25.4%
$-81.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-86.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$-4.6M
Value Created
$-7.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-13.0M
Organic Growth
$16.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-7.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$309K$464K$618K$742K
Denial Rate Reductio$306K$459K$612K$734K
A/R Days Reduction$188K$282K$376K$451K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$20K$24K
Total$813K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-26.5%-11.7%-3.7%6.2%
P9
Net-to-Gross6.9%9.8%25.0%35.9%
P6
Occupancy24.6%30.5%56.8%77.7%
P12
Rev/Bed$247K$469K$700K$1.2M
P12
Exp/Bed$313K$445K$665K$1.1M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML