Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JACKSON HOSPITAL AND CLINIC INC 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JACKSON HOSPITAL AND CLINIC INC
CCN 010024 | AL | 278 beds | Current EBITDA $-31.3M → Pro Forma $-15.5M (+$15.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$301.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-31.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-15.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$15.9M
Modeled Uplift
$11.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.2M (vs $15.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$193K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.0M$6.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.8M$166K$6.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$925K$2.7M$3.7M$11.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$193K$193K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$96K$193K$193K$193K$193K$193K$193K
Cumulative$0$4.3M$8.6M$12.9M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-31.3M$-31.3M-10.4%
Year 1$-32.2M+$10.6M$-21.7M-7.2%
Year 2$-33.2M+$15.9M$-17.4M-5.8%
Year 3$-34.2M+$15.9M$-18.4M-6.1%
Year 4$-35.2M+$15.9M$-19.4M-6.4%
Year 5$-36.3M+$15.9M$-20.4M-6.8%
$-313.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-224.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$88.3M
Value Created
$-20.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-49.9M
Organic Growth
$158.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-20.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.8M$3.7M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$96K$145K$193K$231K
Total$7.9M$11.9M$15.9M$19.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 29 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.4%-9.9%-4.4%2.3%
P21
Net-to-Gross21.8%10.4%20.8%31.2%
P52
Occupancy74.1%52.7%67.0%77.9%
P55
Rev/Bed$1.1M$711K$1.0M$1.3M
P52
Exp/Bed$1.2M$779K$1.0M$1.3M
P59

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML