Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHEROKEE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 13:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHEROKEE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 010022 | AL | 45 beds | Current EBITDA $1.1M → Pro Forma $2.1M (+$977K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$977K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$712K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$977K
Modeled Uplift
$608K
Risk-Adjusted
-$369K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$371K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$368K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$226K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$977K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$371K$371K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$357K$10K$368K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$57K$169K$226K$712K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$93K$186K$278K$371K$371K$371K$371K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$92K$184K$276K$368K$368K$368K$368K
A/R Days Reduction$0$75K$151K$226K$226K$226K$226K$226K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$266K$532K$792K$977K$977K$977K$977K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $977K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x63% / 11.7x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x76% / 16.6x
9.0x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.4x
10.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
11.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
12.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.0x
Headroom (turns)
31%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 31% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.5x, adding 4.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.1M$1.1M6.0%
Year 1$1.1M+$651K$1.8M9.7%
Year 2$1.2M+$977K$2.2M11.6%
Year 3$1.2M+$977K$2.2M11.8%
Year 4$1.2M+$977K$2.2M12.0%
Year 5$1.3M+$977K$2.3M12.2%
$11.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$24.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.8M
Value Created
$2.3M
Exit EBITDA
$1.8M
Organic Growth
$9.8M
RCM Value Creation
$2.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$186K$278K$371K$446K
Denial Rate Reductio$184K$276K$368K$441K
A/R Days Reduction$113K$169K$226K$271K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$488K$732K$977K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 59 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.0%-26.0%-15.9%-0.3%
P75
Net-to-Gross20.0%26.3%32.2%46.9%
P9
Occupancy27.4%21.7%30.5%47.0%
P46
Rev/Bed$413K$327K$480K$738K
P39
Exp/Bed$388K$380K$530K$862K
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML