Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SHELBY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SHELBY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 010016 | AL | 212 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.5M → Pro Forma $7.0M (+$8.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$161.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$8.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$8.5M
Modeled Uplift
$5.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.9M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.6M (vs $8.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$103K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$8.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.2M$3.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.1M$89K$3.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$494K$1.5M$2.0M$6.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$103K$103K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$805K$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$797K$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$653K$1.3M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$52K$103K$103K$103K$103K$103K$103K
Cumulative$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.9M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
8.3x
Headroom (turns)
127%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 127% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.8x, adding 100.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.5M$-1.5M-0.9%
Year 1$-1.5M+$5.6M$4.1M2.6%
Year 2$-1.6M+$8.5M$6.9M4.3%
Year 3$-1.6M+$8.5M$6.9M4.3%
Year 4$-1.6M+$8.5M$6.8M4.2%
Year 5$-1.7M+$8.5M$6.8M4.2%
$-14.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$74.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$89.2M
Value Created
$6.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-2.3M
Organic Growth
$84.7M
RCM Value Creation
$6.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M
A/R Days Reduction$980K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$52K$77K$103K$124K
Total$4.2M$6.4M$8.5M$10.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.9%-10.3%-4.8%2.3%
P62
Net-to-Gross10.2%10.2%21.3%31.1%
P24
Occupancy50.0%49.9%64.6%77.7%
P26
Rev/Bed$760K$702K$984K$1.3M
P32
Exp/Bed$767K$749K$984K$1.3M
P26

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML