Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. VINCENTS EAST 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. VINCENTS EAST
CCN 010011 | AL | 286 beds | Current EBITDA $-50.3M → Pro Forma $-37.2M (+$13.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$249.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-50.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-37.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$13.1M
Modeled Uplift
$9.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.2M (vs $13.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$159K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.0M$5.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.8M$137K$4.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$764K$2.3M$3.0M$9.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$159K$159K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$80K$159K$159K$159K$159K$159K$159K
Cumulative$0$3.6M$7.1M$10.6M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-50.3M$-50.3M-20.2%
Year 1$-51.8M+$8.7M$-43.0M-17.3%
Year 2$-53.3M+$13.1M$-40.2M-16.2%
Year 3$-54.9M+$13.1M$-41.8M-16.8%
Year 4$-56.6M+$13.1M$-43.5M-17.5%
Year 5$-58.3M+$13.1M$-45.2M-18.1%
$-502.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-497.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.8M
Value Created
$-45.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-80.1M
Organic Growth
$131.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-45.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.5M$3.7M$5.0M$6.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.5M$3.7M$4.9M$5.9M
A/R Days Reduction$1.5M$2.3M$3.0M$3.6M
Clean Claim Rate$80K$120K$159K$191K
Total$6.6M$9.8M$13.1M$15.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 29 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-20.2%-9.9%-4.4%2.3%
P7
Net-to-Gross17.7%10.4%20.8%31.2%
P34
Occupancy76.1%52.7%67.0%77.9%
P62
Rev/Bed$871K$711K$1.0M$1.3M
P41
Exp/Bed$1.0M$779K$1.0M$1.3M
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML