Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTH ALABAMA MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTH ALABAMA MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 010006 | AL | 223 beds | Current EBITDA $1.4M → Pro Forma $15.0M (+$13.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$259.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$13.6M
Modeled Uplift
$10.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.0M (vs $13.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$166K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.2M$5.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.0M$143K$5.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$796K$2.4M$3.2M$10.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$166K$166K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$83K$166K$166K$166K$166K$166K$166K
Cumulative$0$3.7M$7.4M$11.1M$13.6M$13.6M$13.6M$13.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x139% / 78.8x145% / 87.9x150% / 97.0x152% / 101.5x154% / 106.1x
9.0x134% / 69.7x139% / 77.7x144% / 85.8x146% / 89.9x148% / 93.9x
10.0x129% / 62.4x134% / 69.7x138% / 76.9x141% / 80.6x143% / 84.2x
11.0x124% / 56.4x129% / 63.0x134% / 69.7x136% / 73.0x138% / 76.3x
12.0x120% / 51.4x125% / 57.5x129% / 63.6x132% / 66.6x134% / 69.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.7x
Headroom (turns)
88%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 88% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.8x, adding 7.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.4M$1.4M0.5%
Year 1$1.4M+$9.1M$10.5M4.0%
Year 2$1.4M+$13.6M$15.1M5.8%
Year 3$1.5M+$13.6M$15.1M5.8%
Year 4$1.5M+$13.6M$15.2M5.8%
Year 5$1.6M+$13.6M$15.2M5.9%
$13.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$167.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$153.9M
Value Created
$15.2M
Exit EBITDA
$2.2M
Organic Growth
$136.5M
RCM Value Creation
$15.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.6M$3.9M$5.1M$6.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M
Clean Claim Rate$83K$125K$166K$199K
Total$6.8M$10.2M$13.6M$16.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.5%-10.3%-4.6%2.3%
P68
Net-to-Gross20.2%10.2%21.3%31.1%
P44
Occupancy82.6%49.9%64.6%77.7%
P88
Rev/Bed$1.2M$708K$984K$1.3M
P56
Exp/Bed$1.2M$749K$984K$1.3M
P59

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML