Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOUTHEAST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 02:09 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOUTHEAST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 010001 | AL | 353 beds | Current EBITDA $-18.8M → Pro Forma $3.6M (+$22.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$427.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-18.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$22.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$22.5M
Modeled Uplift
$16.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.0M (vs $22.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$273K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$22.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.5M$8.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.2M$235K$8.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.9M$5.2M$16.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$273K$273K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.1M$4.3M$6.4M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$137K$273K$273K$273K$273K$273K$273K
Cumulative$0$6.1M$12.2M$18.2M$22.5M$22.5M$22.5M$22.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $22.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-43.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
50.1x
Headroom (turns)
771%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 771% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -43.6x, adding 142.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-18.8M$-18.8M-4.4%
Year 1$-19.4M+$15.0M$-4.4M-1.0%
Year 2$-20.0M+$22.5M$2.5M0.6%
Year 3$-20.6M+$22.5M$1.9M0.4%
Year 4$-21.2M+$22.5M$1.3M0.3%
Year 5$-21.8M+$22.5M$651K0.2%
$-188.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$7.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$195.4M
Value Created
$651K
Exit EBITDA
$-30.0M
Organic Growth
$224.7M
RCM Value Creation
$651K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.3M$6.4M$8.5M$10.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.2M$6.3M$8.5M$10.1M
A/R Days Reduction$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.2M
Clean Claim Rate$137K$205K$273K$328K
Total$11.2M$16.9M$22.5M$27.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 28 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.4%-10.0%-4.6%1.0%
P50
Net-to-Gross20.8%10.9%21.3%31.7%
P46
Occupancy80.7%52.1%66.3%77.9%
P82
Rev/Bed$1.2M$710K$917K$1.2M
P71
Exp/Bed$1.3M$776K$984K$1.3M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML