Corpus Intelligence RCM Diligence — Covenant Stress 2026-04-26 02:33 UTC
RCM Diligence — Covenant Stress
EAST ALABAMA MEDICAL CENTER · max breach 100%
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Working dealEAST ALABAMA MEDICAL CENTER·$20.0M EBITDA
Deal MCCovenant StressPayer StressBear CaseReg CalendarFull Pipeline
Covenant Stress Lab
EAST ALABAMA MEDICAL CENTER
3 tranches · $104M funded · 3 covenants tested · 500 simulated paths
Entry Leverage
5.22×
better than 5.50×–7.00× PE healthcare LBO band
Base Rate
5.5%
better than 7.7%–9.4% 2025/2026 LBO median
Max Breach Prob
100%
worse than 10%–25% bank-acceptable band
FAIL
"Interest Coverage" covenant crosses 50% breach probability in Y1Q1 — $0.5M median equity cure.
Net Leverage: peak 4% in Y5Q1 (median metric 4.15 vs threshold 5.50) · DSCR: peak 100% in Y6Q1 (median metric 0.70 vs threshold 1.25) · Interest Coverage: peak 96% in Y3Q1 (median metric 1.93 vs threshold 2.50)
Max Breach Prob
100%
vs <10% bank target · <25% acceptable
Earliest 50% Breach
Y1Q1
quarter any covenant first crosses 50% breach probability
Simulated Paths
500
synthetic EBITDA trials
Quarters Tested
24
6-year horizon
Plain-English read: Above PE-bank acceptable ceiling (>50% breach). Lenders typically re-price, tighten, or walk at this level.
25%50%75%DSCR Y1Q1\nBreach prob 4%\nMedian metric 1.63 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y1Q2\nBreach prob 4%\nMedian metric 1.63 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y1Q3\nBreach prob 4%\nMedian metric 1.63 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y1Q4\nBreach prob 4%\nMedian metric 1.63 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y2Q1\nBreach prob 4%\nMedian metric 1.66 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y2Q2\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 1.69 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y2Q3\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 1.72 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y2Q4\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 1.75 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y3Q1\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 1.78 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y3Q2\nBreach prob 1%\nMedian metric 1.81 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y3Q3\nBreach prob 1%\nMedian metric 1.84 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y3Q4\nBreach prob 1%\nMedian metric 1.87 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y4Q1\nBreach prob 1%\nMedian metric 1.90 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y4Q2\nBreach prob 1%\nMedian metric 1.93 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y4Q3\nBreach prob 0%\nMedian metric 1.96 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y4Q4\nBreach prob 0%\nMedian metric 1.99 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y5Q1\nBreach prob 0%\nMedian metric 2.03 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y5Q2\nBreach prob 0%\nMedian metric 2.06 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y5Q3\nBreach prob 0%\nMedian metric 2.10 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y5Q4\nBreach prob 0%\nMedian metric 2.13 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y6Q1\nBreach prob 100%\nMedian metric 0.70 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y6Q2\nBreach prob 100%\nMedian metric 0.43 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y6Q3\nBreach prob 100%\nMedian metric 0.32 vs threshold 1.25DSCR Y6Q4\nBreach prob 100%\nMedian metric 0.25 vs threshold 1.25Interest Coverage Y1Q1\nBreach prob 94%\nMedian metric 1.76 vs threshold 2.25Interest Coverage Y1Q2\nBreach prob 94%\nMedian metric 1.77 vs threshold 2.25Interest Coverage Y1Q3\nBreach prob 94%\nMedian metric 1.77 vs threshold 2.25Interest Coverage Y1Q4\nBreach prob 94%\nMedian metric 1.77 vs threshold 2.25Interest Coverage Y2Q1\nBreach prob 93%\nMedian metric 1.80 vs threshold 2.25Interest Coverage Y2Q2\nBreach prob 91%\nMedian metric 1.83 vs threshold 2.25Interest Coverage Y2Q3\nBreach prob 89%\nMedian metric 1.86 vs threshold 2.25Interest Coverage Y2Q4\nBreach prob 87%\nMedian metric 1.89 vs threshold 2.25Interest Coverage Y3Q1\nBreach prob 96%\nMedian metric 1.93 vs threshold 2.50Interest Coverage Y3Q2\nBreach prob 94%\nMedian metric 1.96 vs threshold 2.50Interest Coverage Y3Q3\nBreach prob 93%\nMedian metric 1.99 vs threshold 2.50Interest Coverage Y3Q4\nBreach prob 91%\nMedian metric 2.02 vs threshold 2.50Interest Coverage Y4Q1\nBreach prob 90%\nMedian metric 2.06 vs threshold 2.50Interest Coverage Y4Q2\nBreach prob 88%\nMedian metric 2.09 vs threshold 2.50Interest Coverage Y4Q3\nBreach prob 84%\nMedian metric 2.13 vs threshold 2.50Interest Coverage Y4Q4\nBreach prob 81%\nMedian metric 2.16 vs threshold 2.50Interest Coverage Y5Q1\nBreach prob 79%\nMedian metric 2.20 vs threshold 2.50Interest Coverage Y5Q2\nBreach prob 76%\nMedian metric 2.24 vs threshold 2.50Interest Coverage Y5Q3\nBreach prob 73%\nMedian metric 2.28 vs threshold 2.50Interest Coverage Y5Q4\nBreach prob 70%\nMedian metric 2.32 vs threshold 2.50Interest Coverage Y6Q1\nBreach prob 66%\nMedian metric 2.36 vs threshold 2.50Interest Coverage Y6Q2\nBreach prob 46%\nMedian metric 2.55 vs threshold 2.50Interest Coverage Y6Q3\nBreach prob 12%\nMedian metric 2.99 vs threshold 2.50Interest Coverage Y6Q4\nBreach prob 0%\nMedian metric 3.95 vs threshold 2.50Net Leverage Y1Q1\nBreach prob 1%\nMedian metric 5.20 vs threshold 7.50Net Leverage Y1Q2\nBreach prob 1%\nMedian metric 5.19 vs threshold 7.50Net Leverage Y1Q3\nBreach prob 1%\nMedian metric 5.18 vs threshold 7.50Net Leverage Y1Q4\nBreach prob 1%\nMedian metric 5.17 vs threshold 7.50Net Leverage Y2Q1\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 5.08 vs threshold 7.00Net Leverage Y2Q2\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 4.99 vs threshold 7.00Net Leverage Y2Q3\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 4.91 vs threshold 7.00Net Leverage Y2Q4\nBreach prob 1%\nMedian metric 4.83 vs threshold 7.00Net Leverage Y3Q1\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 4.75 vs threshold 6.50Net Leverage Y3Q2\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 4.67 vs threshold 6.50Net Leverage Y3Q3\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 4.59 vs threshold 6.50Net Leverage Y3Q4\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 4.52 vs threshold 6.50Net Leverage Y4Q1\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 4.44 vs threshold 6.00Net Leverage Y4Q2\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 4.36 vs threshold 6.00Net Leverage Y4Q3\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 4.29 vs threshold 6.00Net Leverage Y4Q4\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 4.22 vs threshold 6.00Net Leverage Y5Q1\nBreach prob 4%\nMedian metric 4.15 vs threshold 5.50Net Leverage Y5Q2\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 4.08 vs threshold 5.50Net Leverage Y5Q3\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 4.01 vs threshold 5.50Net Leverage Y5Q4\nBreach prob 2%\nMedian metric 3.94 vs threshold 5.50Net Leverage Y6Q1\nBreach prob 0%\nMedian metric 2.91 vs threshold 5.00Net Leverage Y6Q2\nBreach prob 0%\nMedian metric 1.91 vs threshold 5.00Net Leverage Y6Q3\nBreach prob 0%\nMedian metric 0.94 vs threshold 5.00Net Leverage Y6Q4\nBreach prob 0%\nMedian metric 0.00 vs threshold 5.00DSCRInterest CoverageNet LeverageY1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6
<10% breach — bank comfortable 10-25% — tight but bankable 25-50% — negotiate cushion ≥50% — re-price or walk
Plain-English read: First covenant to hit 50% breach probability is DSCR in Y6Q1.
How to read: Each line is one covenant. Y-axis is probability of breach across simulated EBITDA paths in that quarter; X-axis is quarters from close. Dashed lines mark 25%, 50%, 75% probability thresholds. Hover any dot for the exact metric value. A line rising sharply through 50% is the covenant to negotiate at the LOI — reset, cushion, or step-down deferral.
Y1Q1: $3.07M debt service ($2.84M int, $0.23M amort)Y1Q2: $3.06M debt service ($2.83M int, $0.23M amort)Y1Q3: $3.06M debt service ($2.82M int, $0.23M amort)Y1Q4: $3.05M debt service ($2.82M int, $0.23M amort)Y2Q1: $3.05M debt service ($2.81M int, $0.23M amort)Y2Q2: $3.04M debt service ($2.80M int, $0.23M amort)Y2Q3: $3.03M debt service ($2.80M int, $0.23M amort)Y2Q4: $3.03M debt service ($2.79M int, $0.23M amort)Y3Q1: $3.02M debt service ($2.79M int, $0.23M amort)Y3Q2: $3.02M debt service ($2.78M int, $0.23M amort)Y3Q3: $3.01M debt service ($2.77M int, $0.23M amort)Y3Q4: $3.00M debt service ($2.77M int, $0.23M amort)Y4Q1: $3.00M debt service ($2.76M int, $0.23M amort)Y4Q2: $2.99M debt service ($2.76M int, $0.23M amort)Y4Q3: $2.98M debt service ($2.75M int, $0.23M amort)Y4Q4: $2.98M debt service ($2.74M int, $0.23M amort)Y5Q1: $2.97M debt service ($2.74M int, $0.23M amort)Y5Q2: $2.97M debt service ($2.73M int, $0.23M amort)Y5Q3: $2.96M debt service ($2.73M int, $0.23M amort)Y5Q4: $2.95M debt service ($2.72M int, $0.23M amort)Y6Q1: $27.61M debt service ($2.71M int, $24.90M amort)Y6Q2: $26.93M debt service ($2.03M int, $24.90M amort)Y6Q3: $26.26M debt service ($1.36M int, $24.90M amort)Y6Q4: $25.58M debt service ($0.68M int, $24.90M amort)$27.6M$18.4M$9.2M$0.0MInterestAmortization
Plain-English read: Peak quarterly debt service is $27.61M in Y6Q1 ($110.4M annualized). At a 1.5× DSCR floor, the target needs $165.7M LTM EBITDA in that quarter to stay inside the covenant.
How to read: Each bar is one quarter of debt service. Red is interest on outstanding balance; amber is scheduled amortization. TLB/unitranche bullets concentrate amortization in the final year — that spike is where refinance risk concentrates. Flat interest early = floating-rate base stable; steepening = rate-path stress.
CovenantFirst Cure QMedian CureP75 CureBreach Path %
Net LeverageY1Q1$5.82M$11.55M4% of paths
DSCRY1Q1$0.86M$0.96M100% of paths
Interest CoverageY1Q1$0.45M$0.63M96% of paths
How to read: For leverage covenants the cure equals the debt paydown that drops leverage to threshold; for coverage covenants it's the synthetic EBITDA add allowed by the credit agreement ("yank-the-bank" provision, capped at ~25% of LTM EBITDA). P75 shows the right-tail scenario — the partner should underwrite equity capacity for at least P75.
Green/amber/red cells reflect PE-bank underwriting thresholds — click any column to sort, CSV exports auto-wired.
CovenantPeak Breach %Peak Quarter50% First At25% First AtMedian Cure $Breach Path %Interpretation
DSCR100%Y6Q1Y6Q1Y6Q1$0.9M100%FAIL — renegotiate covenant or walk
Interest Coverage96%Y3Q1Y1Q1Y1Q1$0.5M96%FAIL — renegotiate covenant or walk
Net Leverage4%Y5Q1never$5.8M4%PASS — clears bank norms
Capital stack · senior-first
TrancheTypePrincipalTermSpread bpsAmortLien
TLBTLB$67.8M6y+4501% + bulletL1
UnitrancheUNITRANCHE$26.1M6y+6001% + bulletL1
MezzanineMEZZANINE$10.4M6y+950IO + bulletL2
→ Deal MC produced the EBITDA cone that feeds this lab · → Regulatory Calendar produced the overlay applied above · → Exit Timing uses the same leverage path for refinance feasibility.
Press ? for shortcuts · b to bookmark · ⌘K to jump