Deal Quality
655 deals scored · avg quality 73.3/100 · A:313 B:338 C:4 D:0 · 41 flagged
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Total Deals
655
in corpus
Avg Quality
73.3
out of 100
Tier A
313
48% of corpus
Tier B
338
52% of corpus
Flagged
41
4 errors total
Quality Distribution
Tier Breakdown
A≥75 · B≥55 · C≥35 · D<35 | composite = 55% completeness + 45% credibility
Score Histogram (0–100)
Filter & Sort
Showing 50 of 338 deals
· p.6/7
Per-Deal Quality Scores — 50 of 338
| ID | Deal | Tier | Score | Completeness | Credibility | Flags | Missing Fields |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| seed_144 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_145 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_148 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_149 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_150 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_151 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_152 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_153 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_154 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_155 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_156 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_157 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_158 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_159 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_160 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_161 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_162 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_164 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_165 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_166 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_168 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_169 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_170 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_172 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_173 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_174 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_175 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_176 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_177 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_178 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_180 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_181 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_183 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_184 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_188 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_189 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_192 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_194 | B | 65.9 | 38% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, deal_type, region… | |
| seed_206 | B | 64.2 | 35% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_at_entry_mm, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, revenue_mm… | |
| seed_240 | B | 64.2 | 35% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_at_entry_mm, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, revenue_mm… | |
| seed_244 | B | 64.2 | 35% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_at_entry_mm, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, revenue_mm… | |
| seed_259 | B | 64.2 | 35% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_at_entry_mm, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, revenue_mm… | |
| seed_263 | B | 64.2 | 35% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_at_entry_mm, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, revenue_mm… | |
| seed_268 | B | 64.2 | 35% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_at_entry_mm, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, revenue_mm… | |
| seed_270 | B | 64.2 | 35% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_at_entry_mm, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, revenue_mm… | |
| seed_274 | B | 64.2 | 35% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_at_entry_mm, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, revenue_mm… | |
| seed_275 | B | 64.2 | 35% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_at_entry_mm, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, revenue_mm… | |
| seed_278 | B | 64.2 | 35% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_at_entry_mm, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, revenue_mm… | |
| seed_284 | B | 64.2 | 35% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_at_entry_mm, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, revenue_mm… | |
| seed_288 | B | 64.2 | 35% | 100% | — | sector, ebitda_at_entry_mm, ebitda_mm, ev_ebitda, revenue_mm… |
Scoring Methodology
Completeness (55% weight)
| sector | 20 pts |
| ebitda_at_entry_mm | 18 pts |
| year | 10 pts |
| source | 8 pts |
| ebitda_mm / ev_ebitda | 8 / 7 pts |
| deal_type / region / revenue | 6 / 6 / 5 pts |
| geography / state / leverage / notes | 4/3/3/2 pts |
Credibility (45% weight)
| Start score | 100 |
| MOIC ≤ 0 (error) | −30 |
| IRR < −100% (error) | −20 |
| EV ≤ 0 (error) | −25 |
| Hold ≤ 0 (error) | −15 |
| MOIC/IRR mismatch >25pp | −10 |
| EV/EBITDA outside 2–40× | −8 |