Corpus Intelligence Value Backtester 2026-04-26 00:40 UTC
Value Backtester
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
About this page

Value-creation backtester: compares a proposed bridge-by-lever plan against corpus P50/P75 base rates, applies lever-level realization rates from the corpus (multiple arbitrage and exit re-rating historically ~48% realized; organic growth and operating leverage ~80%), and returns a risk-adjusted bridge. Distinct from /corpus-backtest (deal-level prediction vs realized).

Source: data_public/value_backtester.py; base_rates.py.

Value-Creation Backtester

Predicted MOIC vs realized base rates · lever attribution · calibration chart · comparable deal cohort — 1,540 corpus deals

VALUE BRIDGE BACKTEST
This page backtests an individual deal model — predicted MOIC vs corpus calibration + lever attribution. For the platform prediction audit (how well platform outputs matched realized outcomes across the 655-deal corpus) see /corpus-backtest.
Target Sector
ASC
Predicted MOIC
2.65x
Entry Multiple
11.50x
Sector P50 Realized
2.80x
Sector P90 Realized
4.00x
Calibration Gap
-5.4%
Comparable Deals
12
Corpus
1,540
Backtest Verdict
IN LINE — predicted MOIC consistent with realized base rate
Predicted 2.65x vs sector P50 realized 2.80x (gap -5.4%)
Calibration Chart — Predicted vs Realized MOIC
Calibration: Predicted vs Realized MOIC (perfect line = 45°)1.80x (n=28)2.10x (n=64)2.50x (n=80)2.80x (n=150)3.50x (n=317)Predicted MOIC →Realized MOIC →
Value-Creation Lever Attribution — Target vs Base Rate
LeverTarget ($M)Base Rate P50 ($M)Base Rate P75 ($M)Realization %Risk-Adj ($M)
Organic Revenue Growth$22.14$19.25$24.5082.0%$18.15
Margin Expansion$6.62$5.76$7.4468.0%$4.50
Multiple Arbitrage (M&A)$19.66$17.10$24.7555.0%$10.82
Synergy Realization$3.86$3.36$4.6462.0%$2.40
RCM / Billing Optimization$4.83$4.20$6.3075.0%$3.62
Payer Rate Uplift$3.22$2.80$4.9055.0%$1.77
Operating Leverage$3.04$2.64$3.8472.0%$2.19
Platform Re-Rating @ Exit$32.08$27.90$38.2548.0%$15.40
Corpus Base-Rate Buckets — Sector × Vintage × Size
SectorVintageSizeNRealized MOIC P25P50P75MeanIRR P50
2020-2022$700M+150.38x2.20x3.35x2.03x17.0%
health_it2013-2016$700M+102.00x3.00x3.42x2.80x27.0%
growth_equity2017-2019$300-700M63.80x4.15x4.88x4.35x59.5%
managed_care2017-2019$700M+62.35x2.90x3.60x2.97x35.0%
health_it2017-2019$700M+62.35x2.75x3.00x2.75x21.0%
2023+$700M+51.40x1.50x2.10x2.02x15.0%
physician_group2013-2016$700M+51.10x1.40x2.50x1.66x5.0%
health_it2017-2019$100-300M54.10x4.50x5.00x4.52x41.0%
home_health2017-2019$700M+52.40x2.80x3.00x2.64x24.0%
strategic_acquisition2020-2022$700M+44.20x6.25x7.50x5.45x38.0%
hospital2013-2016$700M+41.73x2.35x2.75x2.12x16.0%
physician_group2017-2019$700M+41.52x2.50x3.12x2.15x24.0%
2020-2022$300-700M31.95x2.10x2.20x2.07x19.0%
merger2017-2019$700M+32.30x2.50x2.80x2.57x20.0%
secondary_buyout2017-2019$700M+32.55x2.90x2.95x2.70x24.0%
take_private2013-2016$700M+31.25x2.10x2.15x1.57x13.0%
asc2017-2019$700M+33.20x3.80x3.80x3.40x20.0%
managed_care2013-2016$300-700M31.15x2.20x3.85x2.60x17.0%
behavioral_health2017-2019$300-700M32.00x2.80x2.90x2.33x23.0%
managed_care2020-2022$700M+33.10x3.20x3.85x3.57x26.0%
hospital2017-2019$700M+32.25x2.50x2.65x2.43x19.0%
physician_group2017-2019$100-300M33.75x4.00x4.25x4.00x37.0%
health_it2013-2016$300-700M33.25x3.50x4.00x3.67x32.0%
behavioral_health2017-2019$700M+31.45x2.50x2.85x2.03x23.0%
physician_group2020-2022$700M+32.00x2.80x3.15x2.50x28.0%
health_it2020-2022$700M+30.85x1.50x2.35x1.63x20.5%
Pain Management2017-2019$100-300M32.65x2.70x2.75x2.70x20.9%
Physical Therapy2017-2019$100-300M32.65x2.90x2.95x2.77x21.4%
Sports Medicine2017-2019$100-300M32.45x2.60x2.65x2.53x20.3%
Fertility / IVF2017-2019$300-700M32.85x2.90x2.95x2.90x20.6%
Nephrology Practice2017-2019$300-700M32.55x2.60x2.65x2.60x21.1%
MOIC Calibration Detail
Predicted MOICRealized P25Realized P50Realized P75N DealsCalibration Error
1.75x1.50x1.80x1.80x28+2.9%
2.15x2.10x2.10x2.20x64-2.3%
2.45x2.40x2.50x2.50x80+2.0%
2.80x2.62x2.80x2.80x150+0.0%
51.00x3.20x3.50x3.80x317-93.1%
Driver Attribution — What Predicts Realized MOIC
DriverCorrelationP50 Realized MOICP75 Realized MOICSignal
EBITDA Margin > 22%+0.682.75x3.20xstrong
Commercial Payer Mix > 50%+0.422.45x2.90xmoderate
Entry Multiple < 11x+0.522.62x3.10xstrong
Hold Period 4-5 years+0.382.35x2.80xmoderate
Sector: ASC / Outpatient+0.482.58x3.00xstrong
Sector: Home Health / Hospice-0.221.95x2.35xnegative
Revenue Size > $150M+0.332.40x2.85xmoderate
Target Geography: Sun Belt+0.282.30x2.70xmoderate
Vintage 2016-2019+0.452.55x3.05xstrong
Platform vs Bolt-On+0.382.45x2.90xmoderate
Most Similar Corpus Deals
Comparable DealSectorYearEntry MultRealized MOICHold (yr)Similarity
Meridian Surgical PartnersASC201812.50x2.60x5.00.981
Vanguard ASC HoldingsASC201613.00x3.40x6.00.779
TeamHealth – Blackstone 1st LB20090.00x2.60x4.50.294
PharMerica / KKR Acquisitiontake_private201711.70x2.70x5.00.294
BrightSpring Health Services Hhome health / community-201910.80x2.60x4.50.294
Kindred Healthcare / TPG + Humltach_post_acute201810.80x2.60x4.00.294
InfuSystem / ABRY Partners LBOinfusion201511.00x2.60x5.00.294
CONMED Corporation / Gyrus Medasc201716.00x2.60x4.00.294
CRH Medical – Ares Management Gastroenterology202110.40x2.60x3.50.294
National Spine & Pain Centers Pain Management201910.00x2.70x4.00.294
Kindred at Home – TPG Capital Home Health201811.40x2.70x3.00.294
HealthMarket – Welsh Carson poManaged Care / Medical G20137.60x2.60x5.00.294
Backtester Methodology: Corpus of 1,540 deals partitioned into 31 bucketed realized-outcome cohorts (n≥3). Base rates computed at P25/P50/P75 of realized MOIC. Predicted MOIC compared to sector-level P50 realized base rate to produce calibration gap. Lever-level realization rates derived from corpus observation — multiple arbitrage and exit re-rating have historically underperformed targets (~48%), while organic growth and operating leverage are more reliable (~80%). Use this to interrogate any proposed value-creation plan: which levers are overweighted relative to base rate?