← DashboardPRFProfileMEMIC MemoBRGBridgeCIComp IntelSCNScenariosAIMLDCFDCFLBOLBOFIN3-StmtMKTMarketDENDenialRETReturnsLVRLeversWFLWaterfallPLYPlaybookTRDTrendsPREDPredictedMEM2Memo
5
Hospitals in Market
810
Total Beds
$0.8B
Market Revenue
Competitive
HHI: nan
None
Moat Rating (3/10)
#3
Market Share Rank
Competitive Moat (Mauboussin Framework)
Based on "Measuring the Moat" adapted for healthcare. Score 0-10: wide (8+), narrow (5-7), none (<5).
Scale Advantageweak
Switching Costslow
Market Share10.5%
Top 3 Concentration95.3%
Network Density0.62
Margin vs Market+8.8%
Bed Util vs Market+0.3%
What This Means
This hospital has a none moat — no moat — commoditized market position, pricing power limited. The PA market is competitive — many players, value creation must come from operations not market power (HHI: nan).
Implications: Operational improvements are the primary value driver — see the EBITDA bridge. Compare against peers via comparables or see the full PA market.
Top Competitors
| Hospital | Beds | Revenue | Rev Share | Bed Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER | 266 | $474M | 57.8% | 32.8% |
| REGIONAL HOSPITAL OF SCRANTON | 220 | $221M | 27.0% | 27.2% |
| MOSES TAYLOR HOSPITAL | 81 | $39M | 4.7% | 10.0% |
| CLARKS SUMMIT STATE HOSPITAL | 203 | $nanM | nan% | 25.1% |
Regional Payer Mix
■ Medicare 25%■ Medicaid 9%■ Commercial 66%