πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 390338 | PA | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $98K β†’ Pro Forma $4.6M (+$4.5M)
$85.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$98K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$4.5M
Modeled Uplift
$3.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.3M (vs $4.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$55K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$47K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$264K$782K$1.0M$3.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$55K$55K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$429K$859K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$425K$850K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$348K$697K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$27K$55K$55K$55K$55K$55K$55K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x221% / 343.4x228% / 382.0x235% / 420.5x238% / 439.7x241% / 459.0x
9.0x214% / 304.9x221% / 339.2x227% / 373.4x230% / 390.5x233% / 407.6x
10.0x207% / 274.1x214% / 304.9x220% / 335.7x223% / 351.1x226% / 366.6x
11.0x201% / 248.9x208% / 276.9x214% / 304.9x217% / 318.9x219% / 332.9x
12.0x196% / 227.9x203% / 253.6x208% / 279.2x211% / 292.1x214% / 304.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.3x
Headroom (turns)
97%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 97% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.2x, adding 8.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$98Kβ€”$98K0.1%
Year 1$101K+$3.0M$3.1M3.6%
Year 2$104K+$4.5M$4.6M5.4%
Year 3$107K+$4.5M$4.6M5.4%
Year 4$110K+$4.5M$4.6M5.4%
Year 5$113K+$4.5M$4.6M5.4%
$977K
Entry EV (10x)
$50.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$50.0M
Value Created
$4.6M
Exit EBITDA
$156K
Organic Growth
$45.2M
RCM Value Creation
$4.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$859K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$850K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$523K$784K$1.0M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$27K$41K$55K$66K
Total$2.3M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 82 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.1%-12.5%1.7%9.0%
P46
Net-to-Gross16.5%21.7%31.7%44.0%
P14
Occupancy62.3%27.9%46.8%69.3%
P70
Rev/Bed$2.1M$414K$841K$1.8M
P79
Exp/Bed$2.1M$391K$963K$1.5M
P85

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML