πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 170133 | KS | 8 beds | Current EBITDA $529K β†’ Pro Forma $887K (+$358K)
$6.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$529K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$358K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$887K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+541bps
Margin Improvement
$254K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$358K
Modeled Uplift
$217K
Risk-Adjusted
-$141K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$136K
+205bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$132K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$80K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+15bp
Total EBITDA Impact$358K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$127K$8K$136K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$132K$132K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$20K$60K$80K$254K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT88.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$34K$68K$102K$136K$136K$136K$136K
Cost to Collect$0$33K$66K$99K$132K$132K$132K$132K
A/R Days Reduction$0$27K$54K$80K$80K$80K$80K$80K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$99K$197K$291K$358K$358K$358K$358K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $358K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.7x67% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x
9.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
11.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
12.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$529Kβ€”$529K8.0%
Year 1$545K+$239K$783K11.8%
Year 2$561K+$358K$919K13.9%
Year 3$578K+$358K$936K14.2%
Year 4$595K+$358K$953K14.4%
Year 5$613K+$358K$971K14.7%
$5.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$10.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.4M
Value Created
$971K
Exit EBITDA
$842K
Organic Growth
$3.6M
RCM Value Creation
$971K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$68K$102K$136K$163K
Cost to Collect$66K$99K$132K$159K
A/R Days Reduction$40K$60K$80K$97K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$179K$268K$358K$429K

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 26 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-30.0%-20.3%-10.1%
P0
Net-to-Gross16.6%58.4%69.3%88.6%
P0
Occupancy13.4%19.7%23.2%28.8%
P8
Rev/Bed$826K$546K$838K$1.3M
P50
Exp/Bed$1.8M$707K$1.0M$1.4M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML