πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 054146 | CA | 26 beds | Current EBITDA $-478K β†’ Pro Forma $157K (+$635K)
$12.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-478K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$635K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$157K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$460K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$635K
Modeled Uplift
$442K
Risk-Adjusted
-$193K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$240K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$239K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$146K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$635K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$240K$240K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$231K$8K$239K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$37K$109K$146K$460K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$60K$120K$180K$240K$240K$240K$240K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$60K$120K$180K$239K$239K$239K$239K
A/R Days Reduction$0$49K$97K$146K$146K$146K$146K$146K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$173K$347K$515K$635K$635K$635K$635K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $635K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-25.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
32.3x
Headroom (turns)
497%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 497% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -25.8x, adding 124.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-478Kβ€”$-478K-4.0%
Year 1$-493K+$423K$-69K-0.6%
Year 2$-507K+$635K$128K1.1%
Year 3$-523K+$635K$113K0.9%
Year 4$-538K+$635K$97K0.8%
Year 5$-554K+$635K$81K0.7%
$-4.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$889K
Exit EV (11x)
$5.7M
Value Created
$81K
Exit EBITDA
$-762K
Organic Growth
$6.4M
RCM Value Creation
$81K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$120K$180K$240K$288K
Denial Rate Reductio$120K$180K$239K$287K
A/R Days Reduction$73K$110K$146K$175K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$318K$476K$635K$762K

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 74 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.0%-18.0%-6.3%1.8%
P58
Net-to-Gross71.9%29.2%41.6%60.6%
P85
Occupancy71.8%28.4%43.8%67.1%
P78
Rev/Bed$462K$720K$2.1M$3.2M
P16
Exp/Bed$480K$878K$2.0M$3.2M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML