πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 670108 | TX | 46 beds | Current EBITDA $-23.5M β†’ Pro Forma $-16.4M (+$7.1M)
$135.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-23.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-16.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$7.1M
Modeled Uplift
$5.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.1M (vs $7.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$86K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.7M$2.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.6M$74K$2.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$414K$1.2M$1.6M$5.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$86K$86K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$675K$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$669K$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$548K$1.1M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$43K$86K$86K$86K$86K$86K$86K
Cumulative$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-23.5Mβ€”$-23.5M-17.4%
Year 1$-24.2M+$4.7M$-19.4M-14.4%
Year 2$-24.9M+$7.1M$-17.8M-13.2%
Year 3$-25.7M+$7.1M$-18.5M-13.7%
Year 4$-26.4M+$7.1M$-19.3M-14.3%
Year 5$-27.2M+$7.1M$-20.1M-14.9%
$-234.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-221.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.6M
Value Created
$-20.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-37.4M
Organic Growth
$71.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-20.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
A/R Days Reduction$822K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$43K$65K$86K$104K
Total$3.6M$5.3M$7.1M$8.5M

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 284 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-17.4%-21.0%-2.4%10.6%
P29
Net-to-Gross21.7%24.1%34.0%50.6%
P20
Occupancy60.5%22.0%46.8%71.8%
P65
Rev/Bed$2.9M$343K$562K$1.2M
P94
Exp/Bed$3.4M$390K$554K$1.3M
P96

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML