πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 670085 | TX | 151 beds | Current EBITDA $31.5M β†’ Pro Forma $41.4M (+$9.9M)
$189.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$31.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$41.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$9.9M
Modeled Uplift
$6.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.3M
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.7M (vs $9.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$121K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.8M$3.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.6M$104K$3.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$580K$1.7M$2.3M$7.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$121K$121K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$945K$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$935K$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$766K$1.5M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$60K$121K$121K$121K$121K$121K$121K
Cumulative$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
9.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
11.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
12.0x32% / 3.9x37% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$31.5Mβ€”$31.5M16.7%
Year 1$32.4M+$6.6M$39.0M20.7%
Year 2$33.4M+$9.9M$43.3M22.9%
Year 3$34.4M+$9.9M$44.3M23.5%
Year 4$35.4M+$9.9M$45.4M24.0%
Year 5$36.5M+$9.9M$46.4M24.6%
$314.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$510.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$196.0M
Value Created
$46.4M
Exit EBITDA
$50.1M
Organic Growth
$99.4M
RCM Value Creation
$46.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$4.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$4.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.8M
Clean Claim Rate$60K$91K$121K$145K
Total$5.0M$7.5M$9.9M$11.9M

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 166 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.7%-8.7%2.9%13.8%
P81
Net-to-Gross31.2%14.2%21.6%32.1%
P73
Occupancy54.7%48.4%64.0%74.0%
P36
Rev/Bed$1.3M$347K$984K$1.4M
P66
Exp/Bed$1.0M$396K$922K$1.3M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML