πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 524025 | WI | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $454K β†’ Pro Forma $1.4M (+$966K)
$18.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$454K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$966K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$704K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$966K
Modeled Uplift
$618K
Risk-Adjusted
-$348K
Execution Discount
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$367K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$363K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$223K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$966K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$367K$367K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$353K$10K$363K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$56K$167K$223K$704K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$92K$184K$275K$367K$367K$367K$367K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$91K$182K$273K$363K$363K$363K$363K
A/R Days Reduction$0$74K$149K$223K$223K$223K$223K$223K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$263K$526K$783K$966K$966K$966K$966K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $966K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x83% / 20.8x88% / 23.4x92% / 26.1x94% / 27.4x96% / 28.8x
9.0x78% / 18.1x83% / 20.5x87% / 22.8x89% / 24.0x91% / 25.2x
10.0x74% / 16.0x78% / 18.1x82% / 20.2x84% / 21.3x86% / 22.4x
11.0x70% / 14.2x74% / 16.2x78% / 18.1x80% / 19.1x82% / 20.0x
12.0x66% / 12.8x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.3x77% / 17.2x78% / 18.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.8x
Headroom (turns)
58%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 58% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.7x, adding 5.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$454Kβ€”$454K2.5%
Year 1$468K+$644K$1.1M6.1%
Year 2$482K+$966K$1.4M7.9%
Year 3$497K+$966K$1.5M8.0%
Year 4$512K+$966K$1.5M8.0%
Year 5$527K+$966K$1.5M8.1%
$4.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$16.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.9M
Value Created
$1.5M
Exit EBITDA
$724K
Organic Growth
$9.7M
RCM Value Creation
$1.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$184K$275K$367K$441K
Denial Rate Reductio$182K$273K$363K$436K
A/R Days Reduction$112K$168K$223K$268K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$483K$724K$966K$1.2M

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.5%-9.9%1.6%8.6%
P51
Net-to-Gross95.0%38.2%47.0%52.9%
P99
Occupancy43.3%25.5%37.7%49.9%
P59
Rev/Bed$734K$937K$2.0M$3.1M
P21
Exp/Bed$716K$1.1M$1.8M$3.0M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML