πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 374006 | OK | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $332K β†’ Pro Forma $564K (+$232K)
$4.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$332K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$232K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$564K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+557bps
Margin Improvement
$159K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$232K
Modeled Uplift
$175K
Risk-Adjusted
-$56K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$88K
+212bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$83K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$51K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+23bp
Total EBITDA Impact$232K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$80K$8K$88K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$83K$83K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$13K$38K$51K$159K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT57.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$22K$44K$66K$88K$88K$88K$88K
Cost to Collect$0$21K$42K$62K$83K$83K$83K$83K
A/R Days Reduction$0$17K$34K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$65K$129K$189K$232K$232K$232K$232K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $232K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.8x
9.0x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.8x
10.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
11.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
12.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$332Kβ€”$332K8.0%
Year 1$342K+$154K$497K12.0%
Year 2$353K+$232K$584K14.1%
Year 3$363K+$232K$595K14.3%
Year 4$374K+$232K$606K14.6%
Year 5$385K+$232K$617K14.8%
$3.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$6.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.5M
Value Created
$617K
Exit EBITDA
$530K
Organic Growth
$2.3M
RCM Value Creation
$617K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$44K$66K$88K$106K
Cost to Collect$42K$62K$83K$100K
A/R Days Reduction$25K$38K$51K$61K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$116K$174K$232K$278K

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 58 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-28.7%-17.9%-5.8%
P0
Net-to-Gross17.8%25.9%45.5%57.4%
P9
Occupancy88.7%14.9%27.6%50.6%
P97
Rev/Bed$260K$325K$579K$850K
P9
Exp/Bed$1.2M$496K$714K$1.2M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML