πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 361303 | OH | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $11.9M β†’ Pro Forma $13.6M (+$1.7M)
$31.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$11.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$588K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$630K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$623K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$383K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$20K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$630K$630K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$606K$17K$623K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$97K$287K$383K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$20K$20K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$157K$315K$472K$630K$630K$630K$630K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$156K$312K$468K$623K$623K$623K$623K
A/R Days Reduction$0$128K$255K$383K$383K$383K$383K$383K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K
Cumulative$0$451K$902K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
9.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x
10.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x
11.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x
12.0x25% / 3.1x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.9x
Headroom (turns)
-14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.4x, adding 1.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$11.9Mβ€”$11.9M37.8%
Year 1$12.3M+$1.1M$13.4M42.5%
Year 2$12.6M+$1.7M$14.3M45.4%
Year 3$13.0M+$1.7M$14.7M46.6%
Year 4$13.4M+$1.7M$15.1M47.8%
Year 5$13.8M+$1.7M$15.5M49.1%
$119.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$170.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$51.0M
Value Created
$15.5M
Exit EBITDA
$19.0M
Organic Growth
$16.6M
RCM Value Creation
$15.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$315K$472K$630K$756K
Denial Rate Reductio$312K$468K$623K$748K
A/R Days Reduction$192K$287K$383K$460K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$20K$24K
Total$828K$1.2M$1.7M$2.0M

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 70 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin37.8%-12.2%-3.3%12.8%
P96
Net-to-Gross52.3%29.5%38.6%47.0%
P89
Occupancy36.8%24.4%36.4%53.0%
P51
Rev/Bed$1.6M$489K$1.3M$2.3M
P57
Exp/Bed$979K$532K$1.4M$2.4M
P39

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML