πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 232039 | MI | 42 beds | Current EBITDA $494K β†’ Pro Forma $985K (+$491K)
$9.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$494K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$491K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$985K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+534bps
Margin Improvement
$353K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$491K
Modeled Uplift
$298K
Risk-Adjusted
-$192K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$185K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$184K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$112K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$491K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$177K$8K$185K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$184K$184K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$28K$84K$112K$353K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$46K$93K$139K$185K$185K$185K$185K
Cost to Collect$0$46K$92K$138K$184K$184K$184K$184K
A/R Days Reduction$0$37K$75K$112K$112K$112K$112K$112K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$134K$269K$398K$491K$491K$491K$491K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $491K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.2x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.7x
9.0x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.4x
10.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x
11.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x
12.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.3x
Headroom (turns)
35%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 35% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.2x, adding 4.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$494Kβ€”$494K5.4%
Year 1$509K+$327K$836K9.1%
Year 2$524K+$491K$1.0M11.0%
Year 3$540K+$491K$1.0M11.2%
Year 4$556K+$491K$1.0M11.4%
Year 5$573K+$491K$1.1M11.6%
$4.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$11.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.8M
Value Created
$1.1M
Exit EBITDA
$787K
Organic Growth
$4.9M
RCM Value Creation
$1.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$93K$139K$185K$222K
Cost to Collect$92K$138K$184K$221K
A/R Days Reduction$56K$84K$112K$134K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$245K$368K$491K$589K

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 75 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.4%-12.4%-3.3%8.3%
P68
Net-to-Gross59.5%31.4%37.3%46.5%
P89
Occupancy29.6%17.4%36.4%55.1%
P43
Rev/Bed$219K$646K$1.4M$2.3M
P1
Exp/Bed$207K$617K$1.5M$2.3M
P1

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML