πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 052032 | CA | 81 beds | Current EBITDA $2.8M β†’ Pro Forma $5.7M (+$2.8M)
$53.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$2.8M
Modeled Uplift
$2.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$774K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.0M (vs $2.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$650K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$34K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.0M$29K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$164K$486K$650K$2.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$34K$34K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$267K$534K$801K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$264K$529K$793K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$217K$433K$650K$650K$650K$650K$650K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K
Cumulative$0$765K$1.5M$2.3M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x66% / 12.4x70% / 14.2x74% / 15.9x76% / 16.8x78% / 17.7x
9.0x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.4x
10.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x
11.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x
12.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.2x
Headroom (turns)
35%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 35% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.3x, adding 4.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.8Mβ€”$2.8M5.3%
Year 1$2.9M+$1.9M$4.8M9.0%
Year 2$3.0M+$2.8M$5.8M10.9%
Year 3$3.1M+$2.8M$5.9M11.1%
Year 4$3.2M+$2.8M$6.0M11.3%
Year 5$3.3M+$2.8M$6.1M11.4%
$28.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$67.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$38.7M
Value Created
$6.1M
Exit EBITDA
$4.5M
Organic Growth
$28.1M
RCM Value Creation
$6.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$534K$801K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$529K$793K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$325K$488K$650K$780K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$26K$34K$41K
Total$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 154 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.3%-23.0%-5.4%3.7%
P80
Net-to-Gross16.4%19.2%24.3%36.8%
P15
Occupancy74.9%42.9%56.9%71.5%
P78
Rev/Bed$660K$511K$905K$2.1M
P36
Exp/Bed$624K$601K$1.1M$2.2M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML