πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 673071 | TX | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $1.8M β†’ Pro Forma $3.1M (+$1.4M)
$26.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$967K
Risk-Adjusted
-$418K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$526K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$521K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$320K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$526K$526K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$507K$14K$521K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$81K$239K$320K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$132K$263K$395K$526K$526K$526K$526K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$130K$261K$391K$521K$521K$521K$521K
A/R Days Reduction$0$107K$213K$320K$320K$320K$320K$320K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$377K$754K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 11.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.9x73% / 15.7x
9.0x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x
10.0x52% / 8.1x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
11.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.5x
12.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.8x
Headroom (turns)
27%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 27% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.7x, adding 3.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.8Mβ€”$1.8M6.7%
Year 1$1.8M+$923K$2.7M10.4%
Year 2$1.9M+$1.4M$3.3M12.4%
Year 3$1.9M+$1.4M$3.3M12.6%
Year 4$2.0M+$1.4M$3.4M12.8%
Year 5$2.0M+$1.4M$3.4M13.0%
$17.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$37.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.1M
Value Created
$3.4M
Exit EBITDA
$2.8M
Organic Growth
$13.8M
RCM Value Creation
$3.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$263K$395K$526K$632K
Denial Rate Reductio$261K$391K$521K$625K
A/R Days Reduction$160K$240K$320K$384K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$13K$17K$20K
Total$692K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 232 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.7%-14.4%0.1%11.4%
P64
Net-to-Gross70.8%19.4%30.6%49.7%
P93
Occupancy66.7%33.2%56.1%72.4%
P66
Rev/Bed$439K$318K$544K$1.1M
P37
Exp/Bed$409K$327K$492K$1.1M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML