πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 454136 | TX | 48 beds | Current EBITDA $1.3M β†’ Pro Forma $1.9M (+$646K)
$12.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$646K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$468K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$646K
Modeled Uplift
$456K
Risk-Adjusted
-$190K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$244K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$243K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$149K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$646K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$244K$244K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$235K$8K$243K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$37K$111K$149K$468K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$61K$122K$183K$244K$244K$244K$244K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$61K$122K$183K$243K$243K$243K$243K
A/R Days Reduction$0$50K$99K$149K$149K$149K$149K$149K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$176K$352K$524K$646K$646K$646K$646K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $646K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x
9.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
10.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
11.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.3Mβ€”$1.3M10.4%
Year 1$1.3M+$431K$1.7M14.3%
Year 2$1.4M+$646K$2.0M16.4%
Year 3$1.4M+$646K$2.0M16.7%
Year 4$1.4M+$646K$2.1M17.0%
Year 5$1.5M+$646K$2.1M17.4%
$12.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$23.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.6M
Value Created
$2.1M
Exit EBITDA
$2.0M
Organic Growth
$6.5M
RCM Value Creation
$2.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$122K$183K$244K$293K
Denial Rate Reductio$122K$183K$243K$292K
A/R Days Reduction$74K$111K$149K$178K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$323K$484K$646K$775K

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 281 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.4%-20.9%-2.9%10.8%
P74
Net-to-Gross49.7%24.1%34.1%51.1%
P72
Occupancy72.2%23.1%50.1%72.2%
P75
Rev/Bed$254K$335K$561K$1.1M
P15
Exp/Bed$228K$367K$537K$1.2M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML