πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 454064 | TX | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $-54K β†’ Pro Forma $648K (+$702K)
$13.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-54K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$702K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$648K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$511K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$702K
Modeled Uplift
$460K
Risk-Adjusted
-$242K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$266K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$264K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$162K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$702K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$266K$266K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$256K$8K$264K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$41K$121K$162K$511K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$67K$133K$200K$266K$266K$266K$266K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$66K$132K$198K$264K$264K$264K$264K
A/R Days Reduction$0$54K$108K$162K$162K$162K$162K$162K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$191K$383K$570K$702K$702K$702K$702K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $702K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-0.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.2x
Headroom (turns)
111%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 111% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -0.7x, adding 99.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-54Kβ€”$-54K-0.4%
Year 1$-56K+$468K$412K3.1%
Year 2$-58K+$702K$645K4.8%
Year 3$-59K+$702K$643K4.8%
Year 4$-61K+$702K$641K4.8%
Year 5$-63K+$702K$639K4.8%
$-543K
Entry EV (10x)
$7.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.6M
Value Created
$639K
Exit EBITDA
$-86K
Organic Growth
$7.0M
RCM Value Creation
$639K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$133K$200K$266K$319K
Denial Rate Reductio$132K$198K$264K$317K
A/R Days Reduction$81K$121K$162K$194K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$351K$527K$702K$843K

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 224 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.4%-12.3%1.8%11.7%
P46
Net-to-Gross44.8%17.5%29.6%45.9%
P72
Occupancy52.9%39.8%57.3%75.0%
P42
Rev/Bed$166K$291K$554K$1.1M
P8
Exp/Bed$167K$309K$489K$1.1M
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML