πŸ›‘οΈ Public data only β€” no PHI permitted on this instance.
SC
SeekingChartis
CCN 452075 | TX | 110 beds | Current EBITDA $355K β†’ Pro Forma $2.3M (+$2.0M)
$37.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$355K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$700K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge β€” 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$755K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$748K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$460K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$755K$755K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$727K$21K$748K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$116K$344K$460K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$189K$378K$567K$755K$755K$755K$755K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$187K$374K$561K$748K$748K$748K$748K
A/R Days Reduction$0$153K$306K$460K$460K$460K$460K$460K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$541K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x115% / 46.2x120% / 51.6x125% / 57.1x127% / 59.9x129% / 62.6x
9.0x110% / 40.7x115% / 45.5x119% / 50.4x121% / 52.9x123% / 55.3x
10.0x105% / 36.3x110% / 40.7x114% / 45.1x116% / 47.3x118% / 49.5x
11.0x101% / 32.7x106% / 36.7x110% / 40.7x112% / 42.7x114% / 44.7x
12.0x97% / 29.7x102% / 33.4x106% / 37.0x108% / 38.8x110% / 40.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.2x
Headroom (turns)
80%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 80% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.3x, adding 7.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$355Kβ€”$355K0.9%
Year 1$366K+$1.3M$1.7M4.5%
Year 2$377K+$2.0M$2.4M6.3%
Year 3$388K+$2.0M$2.4M6.3%
Year 4$400K+$2.0M$2.4M6.3%
Year 5$412K+$2.0M$2.4M6.4%
$3.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$26.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$22.8M
Value Created
$2.4M
Exit EBITDA
$565K
Organic Growth
$19.9M
RCM Value Creation
$2.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$378K$567K$755K$907K
Denial Rate Reductio$374K$561K$748K$898K
A/R Days Reduction$230K$345K$460K$552K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$29K
Total$994K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context β€” Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 190 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.9%-9.5%2.4%11.7%
P43
Net-to-Gross13.2%16.2%25.2%36.8%
P14
Occupancy43.3%44.9%59.9%75.3%
P22
Rev/Bed$343K$301K$585K$1.3M
P30
Exp/Bed$340K$313K$584K$1.2M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%β†’5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR Γ— delta Γ— avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume Γ— cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

📄 Download ExcelValue TrackerFund LearningHospital ProfileML AnalysisPE ReturnsDCFLBO ModelDeal Screener
Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML